The Voice 2.8: February 19, 2012

posted in: The Voice | 2

The Voice

Justification

We reckon therefore that a man is justified by faith apart from the works of the law (Romans 3:28).

Perhaps one of the greatest doctrinal disputes in “Christendom” throughout time involves the nature of justification. Martin Luther’s great doctrinal break with Roman Catholicism came after his “discovery” of Paul’s doctrine of justification by faith, which he took to mean justification by faith alone.

Many Protestants have taken “justification” and “sanctification” and made them the preeminent words to describe their salvation. This sixteenth century dispute is simultaneously projected back to the first century and imposed on the twenty-first. The terms seem technical and hard to understand. And then there is the tension that exists between Paul’s declaration of justification by faith apart from works (Romans 3-5, Galatians 2-3) and James’ declaration of justification by faith and works (James 2:14-26). Therefore, let us attempt to understand the nature of justification as it is revealed in the New Testament.

The word “justification,” in Greek, comes from dikaioo, which means “to render righteous, declare righteous, exhibit righteousness,” according to Thayer. The idea of justification, therefore, involves being made righteous or declared righteous. The importance of justification should be evident: God loves righteousness (cf. Psalm 33:5), and so if we will enjoy God’s love, we must be righteous. Yet how can a man be righteous?

Throughout human history, people have tried to be righteous by holding themselves to a righteous standard. The Jews knew that the Law of Moses represented the ultimate standard of righteousness, since it was delivered by God Himself, and often trusted in possessing that Law as a reason for righteousness (cf. Romans 2:17-24). Pagan Gentiles figured that the gods would be placated as long as appropriate sacrifices were made at the right times. Even to this day many people have at least a latent expectation that “good people”–those who do not commit “egregious” acts of sin, who keep to themselves, and who keep up societal standards–will be saved by virtue of their “goodness.”

These ideas, in all their various permutations, feature a belief in justification by works alone or justification by works of the Law of Moses. Paul confronts these attitudes head on in Romans 1:16-4:25 and Galatians 2:15-3:29. He presents the overarching principle clearly in Romans 1:16-17:

For I am not ashamed of the gospel: for it is the power of God unto salvation to every one that believeth; to the Jew first, and also to the Greek. For therein is revealed a righteousness of God from faith unto faith: as it is written,” But the righteous shall live by faith.”

The righteous, or those who are justified, live by faith, as it is written in Habakkuk 2:4. Our faith now must be in the Christ of the Gospel: the message of Jesus’ life, death, resurrection, Lordship, and Kingdom (cf. 1 Corinthians 15:1-3, Galatians 1:6-9).

But what about those who would be justified by their works alone? Paul will go on to show in Romans 1:18-32 how the pagans have fallen away from God, and in Romans 2 how the Jews have also sinned. Romans 3:9-23 is the grand declaration that all have sinned and fallen short of God’s glory. The sinfulness of mankind negates any hope for justification by works alone. Even though many believe that as long as their “good” outweighs their “evil,” all shall be well, God declares that any sin is sufficient for condemnation and death (Romans 2:5-10, 6:23). In order to be justified by works alone we would have to always do good and never do evil. Since none of us have been able to do this, no one can be justified by works alone.

Paul applies the same idea to justification by works of the Law of Moses, something that many Jews had tried to do for generations and were now trying to impose on Gentiles in Galatia and maybe even in Rome. Paul shows that the Law of Moses certainly declares what is right and wrong, and thus what is sinful (cf. Romans 3:20), but it provides no recourse once one has sinned. The blood of bulls and goats cannot take away sins (Hebrews 10:4)! This is why no one, not even under the old covenant, can be justified by works of the Law alone (cf. Galatians 3:11)!

Instead, we are declared righteous through faith. God did through Jesus what the Law could not do: He provided the sacrifice for sins that allowed people to be reconciled to God (Romans 3:24-26, 5:1-11). Dependence on God, and not on ourselves or on the Law, is the only means by which we can be justified!

But does this mean that we are justified by faith alone, as so many believe? Too many have made Paul’s arguments in Romans and Galatians absolute, declaring that works have no place in justification, and thus go beyond what is written. James helpfully provides the balance in James 2:14-26. Faith alone is as worthless as works alone; it cannot save (James 2:14)! James makes reference to Abraham, just as Paul does in Romans 4, but shows how Abraham’s faith was made evident in his willingness to sacrifice Isaac on the altar (James 2:21-24). Faith alone is dead faith, and James explicitly says that a man is not justified by faith alone (James 2:24).

Justification, then, is being declared or made righteous. Christians are justified by living faith: trusting in and depending upon God in Christ, seeking to obey His will through faith (Romans 1:5, 3:23-28, 6:1-23). We cannot be justified by works alone or faith alone. Instead, we must turn from seeking our own will and seek the will of our Father in Heaven (Romans 6:16-23). Let us be justified by living faith, and seek to do the will of God!

Ethan R. Longhenry

2 Responses

  1. Ralph Johnson

    Two of the commandments God gave Abraham are:
    1. Be circumscised
    2. Sacrifice Isaac

    Questions:
    1. Wasn’t Abraham justified “apart from” his obedience to God’s command to be circumscised? (ref. Romans 4)
    2. If the answer to #1 is “yes,” then what is the difference between these two commands since Jas 2 tells us that Abraham was not justified “apart from” his obedience to the command to offer Issac?

    Brotherly,
    Ralph

    • Ralph,

      Greetings!

      Thanks for your response. Understanding Romans 4 and how it properly relates to James 2 can be quite challenging.

      In Romans 4, Paul has nothing to say about obedience per se; he asks if Abraham is justified “by works” but not “by faith.”

      Therefore, the question we must consider before we can even get to your first question is, “when Paul says that Abraham is not justified by ‘works’ but by ‘faith,” are the works he is describing any work at all, done in faith or not in faith, or is he describing works done outside of faith with the intent to be justified by law?”

      It is quite telling that immediately after saying what he does in Romans 4:1-8 regarding the means by which Abraham was justified, he then speaks of matters of circumcision and the law, demonstrating that Abraham was justified by faith apart from the law or the works of the law (Romans 4:9-22). Since Paul himself has already declared the goal of the obedience of faith for all the nations (Romans 1:5), suggested that the judgment is based upon one’s deeds (Romans 2:5-11), and will discuss the imperative toward righteous conduct in obedience (Romans 6:1-23), to suggest that Paul is saying that Abraham was justified by mere mental assent to a proposition entirely independent of any action– in fact, fully passive– is entirely inconsistent with the rest of the letter, let alone what James will say in James 2:14-26.

      Therefore, understanding “works” in terms of “meritorious works done apart from faith” in Romans 4:1-8 makes the best sense of the text in its context. Paul is trying to show what he also shows in Galatians 3 and to an extent in Romans 9: justification does not come on the basis of genealogy, birth into a covenant, or confession/profession of a righteous standard, but from God on the basis of the believer exhibiting the same trust in God as Abraham did, and the one who has the same type of faith in God as Abraham did is a true “child” of Abraham and thus inheritor of the promises made to him. By definition and necessity, trust is manifest in thoughts, feelings, attitudes, and deeds, and Paul is not denying that. Paul is not denying what James will affirm in James 2; Paul’s concern in Romans 4 is less with those who would merely profess Jesus without the substantive works thereof and more with those who feel entitled to salvation because they feel that they have conducted themselves in a particular, “godly” manner, as if their salvation is something they could earn or inherit based upon certain privileges granted to them.

      Thus, if Abraham did what God said only because he felt that such was the standard and he was doing it with a view of earning salvation, it would not have been done in faith. At the same time, if Abraham did not do what God told him to do, he ceases to put his trust in God, no longer exhibits faith, and would thus be condemned. Abraham was not saved because he worked; Abraham was saved because he trusted in God and thus obeyed what God said.

      I hope that makes some sense. Thanks again!

Leave a Reply